Boeing will plead guilty to a charge of criminal fraud.

Boeing’s Role in Deadly Incidents

Following two deadly incidents involving its 737 Max aircraft that claimed the lives of 346 passengers and crew, the US determined that Boeing had broken a reform agreement. As a result, Boeing has entered a guilty plea to a criminal fraud conspiracy charge. The plane manufacturer also consented, according to the Department of Justice (DoJ), to pay $243.6 million (£190 million) in criminal penalties.

The families of those who lost their lives on the planes five years ago, however, have denounced it as a “sweetheart deal” that would absolve Boeing of all liability for the fatalities. Someone described it as a “horrible abomination.”

A US judge must now approve the settlement. Boeing will escape the publicity of a criminal trial, something the relatives of the victims have been clamouring for, by entering a guilty plea.

Since two almost identical 737 Max crashes in 2018 and 2019, the company’s safety record has come under scrutiny. As a result, the aircraft was grounded for over a year worldwide.


Legal actions and violations

Prosecutors accused Boeing of lying to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) about its MCAS flight control system, which was involved in both crashes, and filed a single case of conspiracy to defraud regulators against the company in 2021. If Boeing paid a fine and successfully finished three years of intensified monitoring and reporting, it consented not to pursue the firm.
However, the US discovered that Boeing had broken an agreement to reform itself following two catastrophic incidents involving its 737 Max aircraft, which claimed the lives of 346 passengers and crew. Shortly after, in January, Boeing consented to enter a guilty plea to a criminal fraud conspiracy charge. When that time was about to expire, an Alaska Airlines Boeing had to land due to a door panel that burst shortly after takeoff.

The DOJ announced in May that it had discovered Boeing had broken the terms of the contract, raising the prospect of legal action. Although the event did not result in any injuries, it increased doubts about the extent to which Boeing had improved its safety and quality record. The Department of Justice Boeing may face legal action after the Department of Justice announced in May that it had discovered the company had broken the conditions of the contract.

Boeing is a well-known military contractor for the US government, and its decision to enter a guilty plea nevertheless leaves the company with a considerable criminal record. It is also one of the two largest producers of commercial aeroplanes worldwide. The impact of the criminal record on the company’s contracting operations is not immediately apparent. Although it can provide exceptions, the government normally prevents or suspends companies with records from placing bids.

Criticism and Calls for Harsher Penalties

What is the appropriate penalty for Boeing for being “too big to fail”? CEO of Boeing to go as company confronts safety issue. Paul Cassell, an attorney for some families of passengers murdered in the 2018 and 2019 flights, stated: “This sweetheart bargain ignores the fact that 346 individuals lost their lives as a result of Boeing’s conspiracy.

Through crafty lawyering between Boeing and DoJ, the deadly consequences of Boeing’s crime are being hidden.” “Reject this inappropriate plea and simply set the matter for a public trial, so that all the facts surrounding the case will be aired in a fair and open forum before a jury,” he said of the judge evaluating the agreement. Mr. Cassell asked the Department of Justice to punish Boeing for more than $24 billion in a letter to the agency in June.

Zipporah Kuria called the plea an “atrocious abomination.” She lost her father, Joseph, in one of the deadly crashes.
“Miscarriage of justice is a gross understatement in describing this,” she stated. “I hope that God forbid, if this happens again, the DoJ is reminded that it had the opportunity to do something meaningful and instead chose not to.”

Former senior manager at Boeing and executive director of the Foundation for Aviation Safety, Ed Pierson, called the plea “a terrible deal for justice” and “seriously disappointing.”
“They’re just basically giving them another get-out-of-jail-free card instead of holding individuals accountable,” he said.

The DoJ claimed that the agreement solely addressed corporate acts that took place before the 737 and did not offer immunity to individuals. All 189 people on board a Boeing 737 Max aircraft operated by Indonesia’s Lion Air perished in an accident that occurred in late October 2018, not long after takeoff. A few months later, all 157 passengers and crew members perished in an Ethiopian Airlines tragedy.

Boeing also consented to pay $2.5 billion, which included $500 million to a victims’ fund and a $243 million criminal fine, as part of the 2021 agreement.
Family members were not consulted on the details of the purchase, which infuriated them. They have demanded that the corporation be put on trial.

As revealed in late June by CBS News, the BBC’s US news partner, senior DoJ staff recommended against prosecution. Senator Richard Blumenthal stated during a June hearing that he thought there was “near overwhelming evidence” to support a prosecution.

Family member attorneys claimed the DoJ was concerned it did not have a compelling case against the company.
A jury in 2022 found former Boeing technical pilot Mark Forkner not guilty of all charges related to the incident. He was the only individual to face criminal charges. His attorneys said he was being singled out for blame.

Expert Opinions on Plea Deals

Emeritus professor Mark Cohen of Vanderbilt University, who has researched corporate punishments, stated that plea deals and deferred prosecution agreements are frequently preferred by prosecutors because they spare them from the risk of going to trial and give the government more control over a company than a standard sentence.

“Because it’s easier to get than going to trial, it may ease the burden on the prosecutor, but the prosecutor also may believe it’s a better sanction [because] they may be able to impose requirements that aren’t normally in sentencing guidelines,” he stated.

READ: 11 Christians Vanish After Imprisonment in Vietnam

Boeing’s Compliance and Monitoring

In this instance, Boeing has consented to spend $455 million on “compliance and safety programmes” and to be under the three-year watch of an impartial monitor. Mr. Cohen stated that it was quite likely that Boeing’s position as a significant government contractor influenced the decision about what to do next. “They’ve got to think about the collateral consequences,” he stated. “You don’t take these kinds of cases lightly.” The MCAS problems were not Boeing’s first legal run-in. Since 2015, it has also settled numerous allegations of illegal manufacturing and other problems with the Federal Aviation Administration by paying millions in penalties.

The incident on the January Alaska Airlines flight has also prompted investigations and lawsuits against the business, which are still ongoing. In a related development, the FAA announced on Monday that it had mandated 2,600 737 aircraft checks in response to complaints that the aircraft’s oxygen generators were moving out of alignment. According to the FAA, this might lead to oxygen masks failing in the event that a jet loses pressure.




Content Credit| Ogunsanya Sidikat Tolani

Picture Credit |

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *